ANALISI PERBANDINGAN PENGGUNAAN BANDWIDTH APLIKASI CONFERENSI ONLINE PADA WEBEX, GOOGLE MEET DAN ZOOM

Authors

  • Riko Gusjakal Muran,  Informatika, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
  • (*) Yuan Lukito,  Informatika, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
  • Nugroho Agus Haryono,  Informatika, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana

(*) Corresponding Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21460/jutei.2021.51.228

Keywords:

Aplikasi Konferensi Online, Bandwidth, Performa

Abstract

During this pandemic, conference calls or often called concall became a tool that was often used due to government regulations regarding the new COVID-19. Due to these regulations the concall application is commonly used by all agencies. Because of this, new users of concall applications haveincreased and many of these new users still do not understand which applications are suitable for the network in their area. Therefore, researchers made research to provide information about QoS (Quality Of Service) from several applications, namely Google Meet, Webex, and Zoom. In thisstudy, researchers conducted research with 20 PC clients who were given network boundaries of 0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% using the Queue Tree andPCQ methods.

In the study, there were 3 stages in the process, namely preparation, data collection, and data processing. The variables used by researchers areDelay, Jitter, Packet Loss, and Throughput. These variables are retrieved using the Wireshark application on the client pc. In this study, researchers used the Queue Tree and PCQ methods to provide dynamic limits to the user and to be able to limit accordingly for each application hierarchically.

In this study, it is known that some applications have a very significant decrease in performance when the confined network reaches 50% or more of the total network obtained by the researcher when conducting the research. Thus the researchers hope that with this study readers can get information about which applications are good for use in their respective areas which have different speeds.

References

R. Singh and S. Awatashi, “Updated Comparative Analysis on deo Conferencing Platforms- Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, WebEx Teams and GoToMeetings,” Updated Comparative Analysis on Video Conferencing Platforms- Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, WebEx Teams and GoToMeetings, 2020.

J. D. Santoso, “ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN METODE QUEUE PADA MIKROTIK,” ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN METODE QUEUE PADA MIKROTIK, 2020.

A. F. Daru, F. W. Christanto and A. Kurniawan, “0760Metode PCQ dan Queue Tree untuk Implementasi Manajemen Bandwidth Berbasis Mikrotik,” 0760Metode PCQ dan Queue Tree untuk Implementasi Manajemen Bandwidth Berbasis Mikrotik, 2017.

A. Rahman, “IMPLEMENTASI MANAJAMEN BANDWITH UNTUK VIDEO CONFERENCE DENGAN METODE FIREWALL MANGLE PADA ROUTER RB951-2n,” IMPLEMENTASI MANAJAMEN BANDWITH UNTUK VIDEO CONFERENCE DENGAN METODE FIREWALL MANGLE PADA ROUTER RB951-2n.

J. M. Jimenez, J. L. Gracia-Navas, J. Lloret and o. romero, “Architecture and Protocol to Optimize Videoconference in Wireless Networks,” Architecture and Protocol to Optimize Videoconference in Wireless Networks, 2020.

I. Faisal and a. fauzi, “ANALISIS QoS PADA IMPLEMENTASIMANAJEMEN BANDWITH MENGGUNAKAN METODEQUEUE TREE dan PCQ(PER CONNECTION QUEUEING),” ANALISIS QoS PADA IMPLEMENTASIMANAJEMEN BANDWITH MENGGUNAKAN METODEQUEUE TREE dan PCQ(PER CONNECTION QUEUEING), 2019.

a. Wati, suroso and sarjana, “Analisis Kualitas Layanan QoS Video Conference pada Jaringan 4G LTE dengan Menggunakan Codec H.264,” Analisis Kualitas Layanan QoS Video Conference pada Jaringan 4G LTE dengan Menggunakan Codec H.264, 2018.

A. J. Clopper, E. C. Baccei and T. J. Sel, “An Evaluation of Z aluation of Zoom and Micr oom and Microsoft T osoft Teams Video Conf eams Video Conferencing Software with Network Packet Loss and Latency,” An Evaluation of Z aluation of Zoom and Micr oom and Microsoft T osoft Teams Video Conf eams Video Conferencing Software with Network Packet Loss and Latency , 2020.

M. Bhakti and W. Wandy, “Web Conference Internet Traffic Analysis during Study-from-Home Period: Case in Sampoerna Uni- versity,” Web Conference Internet Traffic Analysis during Study-from-Home Period: Case in Sampoerna Uni- versity, 2020.

D. Kurnia, “ANALISIS QOS PADA PEMBAGIAN BANDWIDTHDENGAN METODE LAYER 7 PROTOCOL, PCQ, HTB DAN HOTSPOT DI SMK SWASTA AL-WASHLIYAH PASAR SENEN,” ANALISIS QOS PADA PEMBAGIAN BANDWIDTHDENGAN METODE LAYER 7 PROTOCOL, PCQ, HTB DAN HOTSPOT DI SMK SWASTA AL-WASHLIYAH PASAR SENEN, 2017.

F. Andoro, arrrocman and H. Agung, “PENGARUH ANALISA METODE SIMPLE QUEUE DAN TREE QUEUE DALAMBANDWITH MANAJEMEN JARINGAN KOMPUTER,” PENGARUH ANALISA METODE SIMPLE QUEUE DAN TREE QUEUE DALAMBANDWITH MANAJEMEN JARINGAN KOMPUTER, 2020.

I. MUTMAINNAH, “Mengenal Pandas Dalam Python,” Medium, 6 jan 2019. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/@16611092/mengenal-pandas- dalam-python-cc66d0c5ea40. [Accessed 27 May 2021].

M. D. L. Siahaan, M. S. Panjaitan and A. P. Siahaan, “MikroTik Bandwidth Management to Gain the Users Prosperity Prevalent,” MikroTik Bandwidth Management to Gain the Users Prosperity Prevalent, 2016.

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

[1]
R. G. Muran, Y. Lukito, and N. A. Haryono, “ANALISI PERBANDINGAN PENGGUNAAN BANDWIDTH APLIKASI CONFERENSI ONLINE PADA WEBEX, GOOGLE MEET DAN ZOOM”, JUTEI, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–30, Apr. 2021.